In England there was a convention in the order in which ancestors were named although it was not always universally adopted because of traditional regional variations. The usual British naming convention was as follows:
For male children
- The first son was named after the paternal grandfather.
- The second son was named after the maternal grandfather.
- The third son was named after the father.
- The fourth son was named after the oldest paternal uncle.
- The fifth was named after the second oldest paternal uncle or the oldest maternal uncle.
For female children
- The first daughter was named after the maternal grandmother.
- The second daughter was named after the paternal grandmother.
- The third daughter was named after the mother.
- The fourth daughter was named after the oldest maternal aunt.
- The fifth was named after the second oldest maternal aunt or the oldest paternal aunt.
But as always, there were some of the variations to the rules!
Children may have been named after prominent people such as royalty or national military heroes, and these names were likely to have become fashionable. Naming a child after a local wealthy landowner was also common in many rural areas.
INotwithstanding the conventional naming patterns, some families might have broken with the tradition and named a child after another family member, usually a relative that had died and so that name was used as a means of remembrance. Recognising the break and change in the family naming pattern for one child is often a clue leading to an earlier generation ancestor.
Babies were often given the same name as a sibling who had died in infancy. For example when a son named William after his paternal grandfather dies, the next male child was also named William rather than take the name of the maternal grandfather, again throwing the sequence of a traditional naming pattern.
Some of these variations on the regular traditional naming pattern were more likely in the nineteenth century in England. In some families there may be two children of the same family living, both having the same forename where for example William was the name of both the paternal and maternal grandfathers. Families were also not very imaginative when it came to choosing forenames for their children. At this juncture they may be known commonly by a second forename or even a nickname.
Adherence to naming patterns will involve passing the same forenames down by all siblings to their own children and this could confuse unless research is carefully undertaken. If William and Ann have ten children, there are potentially sons and grandsons called William and Ann, so they are cousins of a similar age in the same locality. This means your research has to be stringent to avoid mixing up the families.
Naming patterns can in fact help you to identify which William or Ann is your direct line. It is usually straightforward enough to separate out the lines. Variations from the traditional patterns could easily provide more information about our ancestors and what was important to them in their lives. The perpetual use of the name of a family member that doesn’t fit the traditional naming pattern suggest the importance of a close relationship with an older member of a family.











